Home

Alex Jones Radio
Show

Listening Info Listen Live Sunday Show 4-6PM Podcast

Services

Shopping Cart Infowars.net Newsgroup Forum

Archives

Featured
Stories World News Prison
Planet Commentary Multimedia
Sci Tech

Special Reports

Paul
Watson Steve Watson

Links

Infowars.com Prisonplanet.tv
JonesReport.com Martiallaw911.info

Contact

Advertise Contact Alex Contact Webmaster
Link to Us

MySpace Pages

Alex
Jones Paul Joseph Watson Steve Watson

Shopping Cart

Shop 1 Shop 2 Infowars Store Info

Search

New 9/11 Footage Reveals WTC 7 Explosions

Video clip NIST fought tooth and nail to keep secret contains clear audible
booms as eyewitness describes “continuing explosions” from direction of Building
7

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison
Planet.com
Wednesday, October 13, 2010

Newly obtained 9/11 eyewitness footage that NIST fought tooth and nail to
keep secret contains what appears to be the sound of explosions coming from the
vicinity of WTC 7 after the collapse of the twin towers, offering yet more
startling evidence that the building, which was not hit by a plane yet collapsed
demolition style, was deliberately imploded.

The clip was released by NIST (National Institute of Standards and
Technology) as part of a 3 terabyte package of video and photo data in response
to a lawsuit brought by the International
Center for 9/11 Studies. As we highlighted in our previous
report, almost every single video studied as part of the release thus far
contains damning evidence of controlled demolition on both the twin towers and
WTC 7.

The fact that NIST dragged their feet for so long in an attempt to block the
release of these highly incriminating videos clearly indicates that they were
part of an attempted cover-up. In addition, the fact that some
of the videos appear to have been edited in an effort to hide evidence of
controlled demolition is another smoking gun.

The latest video is from eyewitness Richard Peskin, who filmed ground zero
from a high rise building that appears to be about a dozen blocks down the
street from Building 7. The first portion of the footage is filmed immediately
after the collapse of the second tower of the World Trade Center. At about 10
seconds into the clip, two clear explosions can be heard.

The clip then cuts to a later time and the cameraman states, “…explosion or
something because there’s a lot of police activity and sirens and more smoke
rising from the ground – new smoke – so there was some kind of additional
explosion but I don’t know what it was….maybe it was a federal building or
something like that,” as the camera pans across a shot of WTC 7.

At around 11am – around half an hour after the collapse of the north tower of
the World Trade Center and an hour after the collapse of the south tower, Peskin
states, “I still hear continuing explosions, I don’t know what it is,” as small
explosions can be heard in the background.

At 1:49 in the clip, a louder rumbling explosion can clearly be heard coming
from the direction of WTC 7 – “That’s another explosion,” says Peskin.

The clip was contained in the NIST folder named “Richard Peskin” and is a
combination of footage from the files Peskin 25.avi, Peskin 28.avi, Peskin
29.avi, and Peskin 30.avi.

The fact that NIST tried to sit on the footage for months even after a FOIA
request and that it took a lawsuit filed by the International Center for 9/11 Studies to
obtain the clip clearly indicates that the organization wanted to keep the sound
of explosions coming from the vicinity of WTC 7 out of the public record. The
footage is filmed from a significant distance away from the scene and shows no
detail of anything that could be considered sensitive. The only remarkable thing
about the video is the fact that it contains the sound of secondary explosions,
something NIST has continually denied was a contributory factor to the collapse
of either the twin towers or WTC 7.

In another clip released as part of the same lawsuit, a loud, low-frequency
boom can be heard just before the east penthouse of WTC 7 falls. Once the
support columns that held up the penthouse are taken out, the rest of the
building falls almost within its own footprint.

However, in subsequent clips released by NIST, where the camera is located
nearer to the building, the collapse of the penthouse is clearly edited out of
the footage.

“Several clips from the Cumulus database show signs of editing. In the two
video clips below, the collapse of the penthouse of World Trade Center 7 is cut
out of the video. These videos happen to have been filmed from close to WTC 7,
and have a high quality soundtrack that would have picked up explosion sounds
from the charges that severed the columns supporting the penthouse, especially
the explosion heard in the last video clip presented,” comments the
International Center for 9/11 Studies.

In another clip, the entire collapse of the building is edited out, the audio
is removed and only restored after the building has fully collapsed.

Why is NIST trying to deliberately cover-up evidence of explosions preceding
the collapse of WTC 7?

The 9/11 Commission completely ignored the hundreds of survivors,
professionals, first responders, firefighters and police who reported numerous
secondary explosions at all levels of the twin towers and WTC 7.

NIST’s
final report on WTC 7 concluded that the never before observed “new
phenomenon” of “thermal expansion” was to blame for the destruction of the
building, a completely ludicrous conclusion in a report that completely ignored
eyewitness testimony and hard evidence that indicated deliberate demolition of
the structure.

As we documented for several years, the collapse of WTC 7 is the smoking gun
confirming that the official story behind 9/11 is bogus. The
collapse of Building 7 was reported before it happened by several news
stations, including BBC and CNN.

If the collapse of WTC 7 came as a result of a “new phenomenon” and an
“extraordinary event” that had never happened before in the history of building
collapses, then why did news stations and ground zero workers know it was about
to happen an hour or more in advance?

Explosions in Building 7 were also reported by eyewitnesses inside the
building, including Barry Jennings, who described a “big explosion” that blew
him back to the 8th floor.

Former
NYPD officer Craig Bartmer was in the immediate vicinity of Building 7
before its collapse at approximately 5:20pm.

“I walked around it (Building 7). I saw a hole. I didn’t see a hole bad
enough to knock a building down, though,” said Bartmer. “Yeah there was
definitely fire in the building, but I didn’t hear any… I didn’t hear any
creaking, or… I didn’t hear any indication that it was going to come down. And
all of a sudden the radios exploded and everyone started screaming ‘get away,
get away, get away from it!’… It was at that moment… I looked up, and it was
nothing I would ever imagine seeing in my life. The thing started pealing in on
itself… Somebody grabbed my shoulder and I started running, and the shit’s
hitting the ground behind me, and the whole time you’re hearing “boom, boom,
boom, boom, boom.” I think I know an explosion when I hear it… Yeah it had some
damage to it, but nothing like what they’re saying… Nothing to account for what
we saw… I am shocked at the story we’ve heard about it to be quite honest.”

Other EMTs and first responders were also told that Building 7 was to be
deliberately demolished, including
Emergency Medical Technician Indira Singh - another whistleblower.

“After midday on 9/11 we had to evacuate that because they told us Building 7
was coming down. If you had been there, not being able to see very much just
flames everywhere and smoke – it is entirely possible – I do believe that they
brought Building 7 down because I heard that they were going to bring it down
because it was unstable because of the collateral damage,” said Singh.

(ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW)

Asked who told her that the building was to be “brought down,” Singh
responded, “The fire department. And they did use the words ‘we’re gonna have to
bring it down’ and for us there observing the nature of the devastation it made
total sense to us that this was indeed a possibility, given the subsequent
controversy over it I don’t know.”

Another EMT named Mike who wished to remain anonymous wrote
in a letter to the Loose Change film crew that emergency responders were
told Building 7 was about to be “pulled” and that a 20 second radio countdown
preceded its collapse.

“There were bright flashes up and down the sides of Building 7, you could see
them through the windows…and it collapsed. We all knew it was intentionally
pulled… they told us,” he stated.

Following news reports in the days after the attack that Building 7 had
collapsed due to fire damage, Mike fully expected this mistake to be corrected
after the chaos had subsided, but was astonished when it became part of the
official story.

Mike’s report of a countdown preceding the collapse of WTC 7 was backed up by
Former Air Force Special Operations for Search and Rescue, Kevin McPadden, who said that he heard the
last few seconds of the countdown on a nearby police radio.

In addition, the language used by firefighters and others at ground zero
shortly before the building fell strongly indicates that the building was
deliberately demolished with explosives, and not that it fell unaided.

“It’s blowin’ boy.” … “Keep your eye on that building, it’ll be coming down
soon.” … “The building is about to blow up, move it back.” … “Here we are
walking back. There’s a building, about to blow up…”

The fact that WTC complex leaseholder Larry Silverstein was considering
blowing up Building 7 is now admitted. Washington D.C. prosecutor Jeffrey Scott
Shapiro, who was at ground zero on 9/11 working as a journalist, reported
earlier this year that Silverstein
was on the phone to his insurance carrier attempting to convince them that the
building should be brought down via controlled demolition.

Writing
for Fox News, Jeffrey Scott Shapiro states, “I was working as a journalist
for Gannett News at Ground Zero that day, and I remember very clearly what I saw
and heard.”

“Shortly before the building collapsed, several NYPD officers and Con-Edison
workers told me that Larry Silverstein, the property developer of One World
Financial Center was on the phone with his insurance carrier to see if they
would authorize the controlled demolition of the building – since its foundation
was already unstable and expected to fall.”

In February of 2002 Silverstein
Properties won $861 million from Industrial Risk Insurers to rebuild on the
site of WTC 7. Silverstein Properties’ estimated investment in WTC 7 was $386
million. This building’s collapse alone resulted in a payout of nearly $500
million, based on the contention that it was an unforeseen accidental event.

“A controlled demolition would have minimized the damage caused by the
building’s imminent collapse and potentially save lives. Many law enforcement
personnel, firefighters and other journalists were aware of this possible
option. There was no secret. There was no conspiracy,” writes Shapiro.

However, obviously aware of how it would impact his insurance claim, Larry
Silverstein has consistently denied that there was ever a plan to intentionally
demolish Building 7.

In
June 2005, Silverstein told New York Post journalist Sam Smith that his
infamous “pull it” comment, which has been cited as proof that Silverstein
planned to take down the building with explosives, “meant something else”.

In
January 2006, Silverstein’s spokesperson Dara McQuillan told the U.S. State
Department that the “pull it” comment meant to withdraw firefighters from
the building (despite the fact that there were no firefighters inside WTC 7).
There was no mention whatsoever of any plan to demolish the building before it
fell.

Shapiro’s faux pas unwittingly let the cat out of the bag on the fact that
Silverstein was aggressively pushing for the building to be intentionally
demolished, a claim that he has always vociferously denied, presumably to
safeguard against putting in doubt the massive insurance payout he received on
the basis that the collapse was accidental.

How much more evidence do we need to conclude that Building 7 – which was not
hit by a plane and suffered limited fires across just a handful of floors –
could not have simply crumbled into its own footprint within seven seconds
without the aid of additional explosives?

Of course, if authorities were ever forced to admit that WTC 7 was
deliberately demolished it would then tarnish the credibility of the entire 9/11
official story, which is why NIST has engaged in an obvious cover-up to firstly
withhold and then edit some of the footage in an attempt to hide the
self-evident fact that Building 7 was a controlled demolition.

*********************

Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Prison Planet.com. He is the author of Order
Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a fill-in host for The Alex Jones Show. Watson has
been interviewed by many publications and radio shows, including Vanity Fair and
Coast to Coast AM, America’s most listened to late night talk show.

Prison
Planet.tv Members Can Watch Don't Tread On Me
Right Now Online - Don't Miss Out! Get Your
Subscription Today!

HELP REMOVE HEAVY METALS AND TOXINS FROM THE BODY WITH THIS NEW
BREAKTHROUGH ZEOLITE TECHNOLOGY

Social bookmarks

Email this article

Print this page

Comment Terms Of Use

Login

Username:

Password:

Remember me

Register

Lost your password?

38 Responses to “New 9/11 Footage Reveals WTC 7 Explosions”

ResearchEverything Says:

October
13th, 2010 at 12:51 pm

I haven’t heard the explosions in the other videos…But the first video
here, at the 10 second mark – I did clearly hear that. However, not being any
type of expert, I can’t discern a detonation from a steel beam or other
foundation collapsing…Going to finish the article now.
(the Explosive
Sounds there gave me chills.)

STARMAN Reply:
October 13th,
2010 at 1:31 pm

Im not sure how many Firemen said ” We heard a loud bang and then another
and then the Bldg . came down ” Not possible all those men were wrong
.

admin Reply:
October 13th,
2010 at 2:37 pm

1:49 in the video is clearly a loud, rumbling, deep, and substantial
explosion coming from the direction of WTC 7.

Huggles Reply:
October 13th,
2010 at 5:37 pm

On video two, you can see the roof lift shaft housing/cooling vents
collapse which means the core of the building gave way all the way down.

A very few seconds later the skin of the building fell at free fall speed.
The separation between the two events is roughly six
seconds.

00timebandit00 Says:
October
13th, 2010 at 12:59 pm

Boom boom boom. So, they want to shut the internet down? I just watched the
Penthouse collapse. Well spotted! I noticed that the penhouse jumped a little
in the early seconds, then lol it disappeared altogether and no way would I
have picked that up on my own.

Vic Says:
October
13th, 2010 at 1:47 pm

You still prefer your puppets manipulation?

Dave72 Says:
October
13th, 2010 at 2:02 pm

Powerful. Articles like this are why I come to this site

Vic Says:
October
13th, 2010 at 2:08 pm

9/11 face it was to invade afganistan and iraq

now they will keep the terrosist events going so Iran can be invaded just
like the others.

Your goevrnment is corrupt yes but ask yourselves who are the forces behind
the puppets you call President and Prime minister????????

TheShadow Says:
October
13th, 2010 at 2:11 pm

It’s all big-time jewish lighting! C’mon sheeple! How could it be simpler
than that?

While most of us have been traumatized by the event for too long, the
revalation of this govt scam is now surfacing after way too long as the seed
of truth continues to grow and flourish.

The evil in the heart of man needs to be intimately known and collectively
subdued.

Uuuuhhhaaahhhaaahahahaha….

Matzo Man Says:
October
13th, 2010 at 3:13 pm

The late Barry Jennings was IN WTC7 when it was exploding. He testified
about Stepping Over Bodies as he was being led out.

I wonder what he meant by that. Did someone murder everyone in the building
in order to shut witnesses up? There was a “countdown” over walkie-talkie
radios that you don’t hear about.

Murder has no statute of limitations. So this is not going to “go
away.”

Barry Jennings
Mystery

Glen Reply:
October 13th, 2010
at 7:04 pm

Exactly.

Their only hope is the destruction of the internet so as the free media
can’t keep dringing up the truth.

KEEP COPIES, it is the only way to ensure the truth is preserved, multiple
coppies across the globe would be impossible to completely
remove.

Elektracite Says:
October
13th, 2010 at 3:15 pm

Yea, looks like 7 collapsed at the TOP first, then the rest followed. This
proves the govt is lying as usual to cover up the gruesome murders of 3000
souls plus all the others involved that “knew too much”..
So there you have
it. Three top down demos right out in the open and STILL it’s covered
up.

Randyrocker Says:
October
13th, 2010 at 3:28 pm

Maybe the whole affair could be considered from the other way around. What
I mean by that is, let’s just say WTC7 was secretly planned to be demolished
so that all of the information in it could be demolished and made to
disappear? The owner looking to help destroy the information cooperated, but
they needed something to happen to take the public’s eyes off of the real
ball. Just saying. So they time it out with two passenger planes crashing into
the sides of WTC1 and WTC2 as a distraction with the timing supposed to be
tightly conducted before WTC7 was pulled and came tumbling down. The trouble
was their was a delay a lag in time and the longer it went on the more WTC7
would be exposed as a separate set of circumstances, so it was pulled at the
earliest most likely time to be seen as one big part of the overall
orchestration, it was time wise borderline when considered as having anything
to do with the Twin Towers coming down. Yet WTC7 was the main target of the
day. The real questions should be concerned with what all was in the WTC7
building? Who were the WTC7 clients who rented space for the days and months
and years preceding the buildings demise? What contractors were allowed inside
WTC7? Who used the building as a transfer point for delivering and sending out
critical key information?
Anything other than that would be to ask, where
did all of the gold go that was stored below the Trade Center Buildings, and
how much gold was there, the numbers claimed were a hell of a lot less than
first claimed? Where are these answers? WTC7 may have been the main target all
of the time, but the bigger side show captured the media’s first attention so
much so that WTC7 got lost in the swirl?

Mark Reply:
October 13th, 2010
at 4:36 pm

You’re asking too many questions. Be quiet!

OWN-the-NWO Reply:
October
13th, 2010 at 5:06 pm

No, I think you are wrong with that theory, I think 1 & 2 were the main
targets, 7 and all the fbi, cia, and sec data contained within, was the icing
on the cake for them, tying off loose ends so to speak. But they were so
arrogant/fool hearty they treated it as an afterthought, which is why they
didn’t try and hide the fact that it was being demolished. They just set up
normal charges let it come down in such a blatantly obvious manner, and then
relied on their lap dogs in the media and the supposed scientific watchdogs of
events like these to cover it up. Thinking that if they could get people to
believe 1 & 2 was due to fire from refined kerosene, that 7 could be
attributed to a diesel fire in their shocked stupor, and that their fear
driven ignorance would maintain the lie as that wore off.

billp Says:
October
13th, 2010 at 3:31 pm

I dont remember where I ran across this but if you have not seen any of
these check them out

Google Video: (1-2 hr ea)
1. Blueprint for truth -120 mins.
2. 9/11
Mysteries -full version
3. Dr David Ray Griffin at Boston U. (1-9)
4.
William Rodriquez Part (1-9)
5. Loose Change 2cd Edition
6.9/11 In Plane
Site -72 mins.
7. John Schroeder -47 mins.
8.
ZERO.investigation.Into.911.avi

Blinded by Science Says:

October
13th, 2010 at 3:31 pm

“PULL IT LARRY, PULL IT” !!!!!!

billp Reply:
October 13th,
2010 at 3:49 pm

A better story would have been he said they made the decision to pull he
was talking to the team he pays to jerk him off.

“we made the decision to pull…

skaismith Says:
October
13th, 2010 at 3:35 pm

My mom is a Civil Engineer and said that this was all CONTROLLED, PERIOD.
She pointed out to me back then when I was still in the “Sheeple Colony”. When
you go onto youtube and watch the the towers fall. Look very closely and you
WILL SEE the explosives themselves
being blown as the tower fell. May God
Bless those families and ALL of those who lost their lives. All to start a war
amd more……………………The Devil knows his days are VERY numbered!!!!!!!!!!

toiu Says:
October
13th, 2010 at 3:45 pm

Quotation by admin:

“1:49 in the video is clearly a loud, rumbling, deep, and substantial
explosion coming from the direction of WTC 7.”

It was a loud noise, not necessarily an explosion; and you obviously do not
know the source.

admin Reply:
October 13th,
2010 at 3:53 pm

Former NYPD officer Craig Bartmer – “And all of a sudden the radios
exploded and everyone started screaming ‘get away, get away, get away from
it!’… It was at that moment… I looked up, and it was nothing I would ever
imagine seeing in my life. The thing started pealing in on itself… Somebody
grabbed my shoulder and I started running, and the s---’s hitting the ground
behind me, and the whole time you’re hearing “boom, boom, boom, boom, boom.” I
think I know an explosion when I hear it.”

Just another LOUD NOISE.

admin Says:
October
13th, 2010 at 3:52 pm

Just a loud noise? That’s why NIST was so keen to hang on to this tape in
the face of a FOIA request and a lawsuit then – to prevent us from hearing a
“loud noise”.

Dragon's Eye Reply:
October
13th, 2010 at 6:10 pm

To some folks ( like the tete-tete you are having with a certain other )
you would be considered “casting pearls before swine”.

There will be “denial-cases” even AFTER the truth has finally been embraced
by the ‘media’. Let’s face it. Some will be a “lost cause”, regardless the
outcome!

Cass Dumstein Says:
October
13th, 2010 at 4:18 pm

Hey, calling Mr. Piffle (or is it Ziffle?) better get you cognitave
infiltration’ cap on and get on the net with your batalions of misinformation
trait…. er, I mean, patriot spooks.

We need loads of misinformation to counter those looking at evidence. Ring
up all your servant journos, radio shock jocks and ‘Israel first’ opinion
writers and tell them to start writing that cognitive infiltration stuff.

These bastards are out to hang us, they are on to us and our controlled
mass media,
thankfully, we have that big plane at ‘Kennedy’ airport (now
that is Ironic!) being warmed up every week and fueled.

Getting time to, scitattle. Tasmania looks good, the Aussie politicians are
just as thick as the US lot.

Dragon's Eye Reply:
October
13th, 2010 at 6:12 pm

Rawr, har, har, har, har, har !!! >;=(9)====

* * * A THUNDEROUS ROAR COULD BE HEARD EVERYWHERE! * * *

toiu Says:
October
13th, 2010 at 4:22 pm

Quotation by admin:

“Former NYPD officer Craig Bartmer – “And all of a sudden the radios
exploded and everyone started screaming ‘get away, get away, get away from
it!’… It was at that moment… I looked up, and it was nothing I would ever
imagine seeing in my life. The thing started pealing in on itself… Somebody
grabbed my shoulder and I started running, and the s—’s hitting the ground
behind me, and the whole time you’re hearing “boom, boom, boom, boom, boom.” I
think I know an explosion when I hear it.”

Just another LOUD NOISE.”

I was refering specifically to the noise at 1:49 of the above video which
you highlighted first and you mention a strawman of a person talking about
other noises. I didn’t say ALL sounds associated with building 7 that day were
merely loud sounds. A nice strawman you’ve constructed and knocked down there.
YOU highlighted to sound at 1:49 and called it an explosion coming from the
direction of WTC 7. My point is valid. You do not know either that this sound
is an explosion or the source of the sound.

Regarding other noises from WTC 7 that day;

of course there were “explosions;” they typically happen in fires.
Explosions are not necessarily produced by explosives, or at least things
DESIGNED to cause explosions. My microwave exploded after several years of
use, though I’m pretty sure it wasn’t designed to explode.

Quotation by admin:

“Just a loud noise? That’s why NIST was so keen to hang on to this tape in
the face of a FOIA request and a lawsuit then – to prevent us from hearing a
“loud noise”.”

So the U.S. Government had the power and means to perpetrate and avoid
persecution for, one of the most complex attacks on American soil, but they
had neither the power nor means to either prevent this videos release or
destroy it?

Huh?

Your presumptions and baseless interpretations don’t make sense.

Dragon's Eye Reply:
October
13th, 2010 at 6:16 pm

AND your insistent denial, EVEN in the face of discovery, re-discovery, and
in recognizing the history of “state-sponsored terrorism” as a means of
“Crisis, Reaction, and Solution” escapes you == MAKES NO SENSE EITHER!

Go crawl back into that hole in the ground where you bury your head, and
leave the critical thinking to the experts ( that is, all awake folk – NOT
ignorant, dis-info trolls and all other knot-heads )!

There is obviously NO reasoning NOR rational discussion with the likes of
you!

” . . . casting pearls before swine! “

THE LAST STAND Reply:
October
13th, 2010 at 7:50 pm

Tiou;
Makes a lot sense to wait until there is a real investigation with
a number of truthers in on it before you just pass it off with your
presumptions that are just as baseless.

You can talk to 50 different people and get 50 different 9/11 takes on that
day. One thing you can be sure of is that this will not go away until there is
a real and open invetigation
that is on cspan for the world to
watch.

Billo Says:
October
13th, 2010 at 4:26 pm

The evidence is irrefutable. Now what we need is justice. That fact that no
one in our government will even touch the subject shows you how far gone it
is.

Dragon's Eye Reply:
October
13th, 2010 at 6:19 pm

* * * Previous comment – deleted??? * * *

THEN, “WE” need to BE THAT government who WILL!

yttrium Says:
October
13th, 2010 at 4:29 pm

At time 0:42-0:46 in the NIST EXPLOSIONS video, I see what looks like a
glowing object with a smoke trail moving from left to centre through the dust
cloud. It’s clearly in front of the buildings so can only be a missile launch.
Further evidence of the mysterious Woolworth Missile?

reconscoutsniper Says:
October
13th, 2010 at 5:16 pm

Does any one here remember this post by 0321 retard? Here it is again, in
case you might have missed it.

0321recon Reply:
October 12th, 2010 at 11:10 pm
your forgeting they
didnt know where flight 77 was going……an important FACT regarding your
bulshiiit theory about cheney being asked if the orders still stand and if
that mean they were stood down….
Bombs going off? NO, explosions were
reported, just as they are in all major office/building fires…..the difference
is, real explosive would ahve been audible for miles…….airbags, batteries,
snapping steel…..
Do u care about facts or are you just gonna make em up as
you go?

It is more than evident that 0321 and all those that refuse to go with the
facts are indeed stupid, NWO mouth pieces, or have no conception of reality.
0321 accuses everyone else of distorting the facts, lying , or not debating
the facts. It shall be interesting to hear what these idiots have to say after
all this is brought before them. It goes beyond the pale of tolerance to
continue presenting the evidence when fools continue to try and discredit
it.
I waited till now to execute this post knowing that “time” and fact
would prove 9-11 was an inside job. WTC 7 was a controlled detonation just as
we all know it was. The KC 767 Cargo plane that struck the second tower, the
numerous explosions that occurred after the towers had collapsed , the
thermate found at the scene and all the reports from those that were there
corroborate that the NWO executed this fiasco.

This is why J Edgar Hoover wrote this: “We must now face the harsh truth
that the objectives of communism are being steadily advanced because many of
us do not recognize the means used to advance them. … The individual is
handicapped by coming face to face with a Conspiracy so monstrous he cannot
believe it exists. The American mind simply has not come to a realization of
the evil which has been introduced into our midst”.

Bravo 2…out

Captain Ron Reply:
October
13th, 2010 at 6:00 pm

“The bigger the lie the more people will believe it”

~Adolf Hitler

Dragon's Eye Reply:
October
13th, 2010 at 6:01 pm

Nice refresher! Some of us remember the absurdity well!

When the lies get desperate, the heap of absurdity gets
deep!

banzaimotorcross Says:
October
13th, 2010 at 5:44 pm

CONTROLLED DEMOLITION FROM A MAN LIVING IN A CAVE HALF WAY AROUND THE
WORLD. THE BOOGIE MAN THEORY WOULD FILL IN ALL THE BLANKS TO A BLIND MAN. 1st
video shows new black smoke coming from the base of #7. didn’t barry jenning
say there were body’s everywhere, he walked in everything was intact walking
out was a war zone “why?? i think the third plane was meant for #7, THE
PASSAGERS DECIDED NOT TO LET THAT HAPPEN. gov’t refuses to DO real a
investigation. we the people have a found the gov’t guilty of covering up the
facts, and the media guilty for aiding and abetting IN the crime of MURDERING
3000,TREASON ALONG WITH A LIST OF OTHER CRIMES THAT REACH TO THE MOON.
“TRUTHER UNITED” THE BLIND ARE SCATTERED

Dragon's Eye Says:
October
13th, 2010 at 5:59 pm

Oooops!!!

The Lie is about dead, don’t you think???

This story just refuses to go away ( much to the dislike of the
establishment )!

” Repeat a lie to the people, often enough, and they will accept it as the
truth. ”

So, what happens when it is the TRUTH that is repeated often??? :
One
would think a very similar outcome!

I hope some folk here are keeping copies of all of these documents,
reports, articles, video-docs, and whatever have you! The day the internet
decides to ’stop working’, will be the day that everyone concerned will need
to start handing out mass copies of DVDs they have burned of this stuff!!!

” I believe we have found this empire’s – Waterloo! ”

” The Titanic of Lies and Distortion is taking on water, Captain!!!
“

randall Says:
October
13th, 2010 at 6:10 pm

Ci stanno comunicando che un’altro degli edifici, il numero 7, nel
complesso del World Trade Center. Dobblamo rientrare, il 7 sta eaplodendo! Lo
so lo so.

Dragon's Eye Reply:
October
13th, 2010 at 6:18 pm

En Ingles, por favor???

. . . Con Estado Unidos.

Join
the discussion, sign up/login to post a comment!

PRISON PLANET.com. Copyright © Free Speech Systems LLC 2010. All
rights reserved. Legal Notice. Digital Millennium Copyright Act
Notice.

Home »
Featured
Stories » New 9/11 Footage Reveals WTC 7 Explosions